What was the Board's response to the proposed motion on tablet access?

The Board's response indicated that they viewed the proposed motion on tablet access as unnecessary because they were already in the process of addressing the content available on tablets. This suggests that the Board is proactive in improving tablet access and content, indicating they have strategies in place that align with the intent of the motion. By having existing measures already underway, the Board likely felt that the proposed motion would not add significant value or address a gap that they were not already covering. This reflects a commitment to leveraging and enhancing current resources rather than overhauling or duplicating efforts regarding digital formats.

In contrast, the other choices do not accurately capture the Board's perspective. For instance, showing full support or agreeing with all parts of the motion would imply that they see a need for further action, which is inconsistent with their assessment. Conversely, opposing any digital format changes would indicate a reluctance to engage with evolving technological needs, which doesn't align with the proactive stance of addressing tablet content already in motion.